Widow’s Heartbreak: Gauteng Woman Battles Old Mutual Over R1.68 Million Life Cover Rejection

A tragic death, a denied claim, and a six-year fight that’s far from over.

When Annette Monica Mulder lost her husband, Rudolf Johan Frederick Mulder, in January 2018, she expected grief. What she didn’t expect was a bitter battle with one of South Africa’s biggest insurers.

Today, the 60-year-old widow from Gauteng is still locked in a painful standoff with Old Mutual over a life insurance policy worth R1.68 million—a payout she says is rightfully hers. But Old Mutual is not budging. The company claims her husband died by suicide, a cause they say voids the payout. She insists that conclusion is not only unfair, but deeply flawed.

A policy taken in good faith

Back in 2009, Rudolf Mulder took out a life insurance policy with Old Mutual. Annette says they reviewed the contract carefully and were aware of only three exclusions: death during a crime, war, or strike.

“There was no mention of suicide in the policy,” she says. “Nothing. If it had been there, we never would have accepted those terms. We were never warned about this, and I believe it was added afterward without us knowing.”

For Annette, the issue isn’t just legal. It’s personal. She was there the night her husband died.

A normal day turned nightmarish

“It was an ordinary day,” she recalls. “We were braaiing with neighbours, chatting, laughing. No arguments. Nothing unusual.”

That peace was shattered later that night by a loud bang from their bedroom. Rudolf had gone upstairs ahead of her. Moments later, Annette says, everything changed.

“I found him there… and I still can’t believe it,” she says, her voice breaking. “He was a meticulous man. Every night, he’d check and lock up his firearms. I believe this was a tragic accident. It wasn’t suicide.”

Her claim was rejected in 2019, with Old Mutual citing suicide as the cause. The insurer said their decision was backed by police, ballistic, and pathology reports as well as the Ombudsman for Long-term Insurance.

A widow’s world unravels

Annette, who worked for years as an insurance broker herself, says the experience shattered her trust in the industry. She stopped working soon after the claim was denied.

“I fell into a deep depression. I couldn’t face clients anymore. I was broken, both mentally and physically,” she says.

Her fight has since continued through complaints to the Ombudsman and ongoing appeals to Old Mutual. But nothing has changed.

Old Mutual spokesperson Kavir Ramjee confirmed to IOL that the decision stands unless new evidence shows that Rudolf’s death was accidental.

Social media sympathy and outrage

On social media, support for Annette has been growing. Some users have called the rejection “heartless,” while others have shared their own frustrations with insurance companies they feel are quick to collect premiums but slow to pay when it matters.

“What’s the point of insurance if they can just pick whatever cause of death suits them to not pay?” one user commented.

Others have urged Annette to take the fight public and seek legal help beyond the Ombudsman.

A bigger question about trust and transparency

This case has reignited debate around transparency in life insurance contracts and how much power insurers have when interpreting complex or ambiguous causes of death. Should a claim be rejected based on inconclusive circumstances? Who gets to decide what counts as proof?

For many South Africans, the fear is not just of death, but of being failed by the very systems designed to protect their families.

As Annette Mulder continues her lonely legal battle, her story is a reminder of the fine print, and of the emotional toll when policy and humanity clash.

{Source: IOL}

Follow Joburg ETC on Facebook, Twitter , TikTok and Instagram

For more News in Johannesburg, visit joburgetc.com