Chauke Suspended: Ramaphosa Moves to Clean House at the NPA

After months of whispers and rising public pressure, President Cyril Ramaphosa has made a decisive move. Andrew Chauke, South Gauteng’s long-serving Director of Public Prosecutions, has been suspended, opening the door to a long-awaited inquiry.

A Presidency Under Pressure Finally Acts

Late Monday evening, presidential spokesperson Vincent Magwenya confirmed what many had been anticipating for nearly a year: Advocate Andrew Chauke is officially on ice. The announcement was swift, but the fallout promises to be anything but.

Ramaphosa’s decision follows recommendations from National Director of Public Prosecutions Shamila Batohi, who in August 2023 raised red flags about Chauke’s decision-making in key cases. Her concerns were not only internal whispers—they eventually echoed all the way to Parliament.

Chauke, who has held the powerful post since 2011, was at the helm of prosecutions in Johannesburg, handling high-profile cases involving corruption, violent crime, and political scandals. In short, his decisions shaped South Africa’s justice narrative for more than a decade.

What Triggered the Suspension?

The final straw appears to be Chauke’s controversial 2014 decision to drop multiple charges, including murder and kidnapping, against former Crime Intelligence boss Richard Mdluli. The move raised eyebrows back then but has resurfaced in today’s accountability-focused climate.

By May 2025, the case had found its way back into the spotlight, with Parliament briefed on its troubling developments. Ramaphosa, aware of growing distrust in the prosecutorial system, moved to distance the presidency from any hint of political interference.

“The President believes Chauke’s continued tenure while facing serious accusations would negatively affect the reputation of the NPA as a whole,” said Magwenya in the official statement.

Chauke Pushes Back

Advocate Chauke hasn’t gone quietly. He’s denied any misconduct, calling the accusations “unfounded, outdated and politically motivated.” Insiders suggest he views the move as part of a broader campaign to discredit him during a politically volatile period.

Still, the President’s office insists the suspension isn’t a judgment—it’s a pause for due process. An independent inquiry will now determine Chauke’s “fitness to hold office,” allowing for a fact-based outcome rather than a media-driven one.

Restoring Public Trust in the NPA

This isn’t just about one man. For many South Africans, Chauke’s suspension is symbolic. The National Prosecuting Authority has long been under fire for delays in corruption cases, politically charged prosecutions, and a perceived lack of accountability.

Social media was ablaze following the announcement:

• “Finally. That Chauke situation has been hanging over the NPA for too long,” tweeted @SAJusticeWatch.

• “We need more transparency like this. The public deserves answers,” said a user on Reddit’s r/SouthAfrica thread.

Legal analysts, too, have cautiously welcomed the move. “This is a reset moment for the NPA,” said Gauteng-based legal commentator Nandi Molefe. “Ramaphosa had to show he’s serious about cleaning up the prosecutorial service before elections heat up.”

A Broader Cabinet Shake-Up

Chauke isn’t the only one packing up his office. In a separate but equally impactful development, Higher Education Minister Nobuhle Nkabane has been removed from her post. Buti Manamela, previously her deputy, now takes the reins, with Nomusa Dube-Ncube, former KZN Premier, stepping in as deputy minister.

While no official explanation was given for Nkabane’s dismissal, insiders suggest the reshuffle aims to steady the ministry ahead of key university funding reforms and protests expected later this year.

The Bigger Picture

Ramaphosa’s leadership has often been criticised as too cautious, slow to act, hesitant to offend powerful players. But the suspension of Chauke may mark a turning point. It signals a willingness to disrupt the status quo and uphold credibility at a time when public faith in institutions is fragile.

Whether the inquiry clears Chauke or confirms wrongdoing, the message is clear: no official is above scrutiny, and the NPA cannot afford even the perception of bias or incompetence.

South Africa, weary of corruption scandals and political theatre, might finally be seeing signs of accountability catching up.

What do you think? Is Chauke’s suspension overdue or politically convenient?

{Source: IOL}

Follow Joburg ETC on Facebook, Twitter , TikTok and Instagram

For more News in Johannesburg, visit joburgetc.com