ActionSA Takes Macpherson to Parliament’s Ethics Committee Over Alleged Racist Remarks

A Heated Confrontation Leads to Serious Allegations

A fiery clash between political supporters in Pietermaritzburg has now escalated into a serious political scandal, with ActionSA accusing Public Works Minister Dean Macpherson of making racist remarks. The confrontation between ActionSA and DA supporters over a picketing area during a court challenge against the eThekwini municipality has sparked an uproar, with Macpherson allegedly referring to ActionSA’s supporters as “Amaphara” and “hobos.”

The Accusation of Racism

ActionSA, led by MP Alan Beesley, wasted no time in calling out the remarks, describing them as “racist” and deeply offensive. The words were reportedly directed at a predominantly Black group of ActionSA supporters, triggering strong reactions given South Africa’s turbulent history with racial discrimination.

Beesley’s public statement reflected the gravity of the situation: “These terms are not just derogatory; they have historical connotations that cannot be ignored. It is unconscionable that a high-ranking member of parliament would resort to such inflammatory rhetoric.” He went on to stress that Macpherson’s actions were incompatible with the values enshrined in South Africa’s constitution, which emphasizes equality and respect for all citizens.

A Call for Accountability

Despite the outcry, Macpherson has refused to apologize or retract his remarks. ActionSA’s calls for an apology have been met with silence, leading them to take the next step: filing a complaint with the parliamentary ethics committee. They argue that his behavior breaches parliamentary codes, particularly sections that demand members maintain public trust and work toward eradicating all forms of discrimination.

This move has reignited broader conversations about accountability in South African politics, particularly regarding the behavior of elected officials. Many argue that if leaders cannot respect basic decency and human dignity, they cannot be trusted with the responsibilities of their office.

Macpherson’s Response: A Counterattack

Macpherson, however, remains defiant. In his response to the claims, he dismissed the accusations as a deliberate attempt by ActionSA to deflect attention from his ongoing work with the Independent Development Trust (IDT). He suggested that the allegations were timed to coincide with a corruption investigation involving the IDT, a topic he has been pushing to address in his ministry.

“This is not the first time ActionSA has tried to discredit me,” Macpherson said. “Earlier this year, they accused me of bribing journalists to suppress critical stories. Now, as I focus on tackling corruption, they turn to these ‘bogus’ racism claims to shift the narrative.”

A Broader Debate on Leadership and Accountability

This controversy is about more than just a minister’s words; it has sparked a wider conversation about the standards South Africa’s leaders should adhere to. With ongoing challenges such as corruption and racial tensions still prevalent in the country, many feel that public officials must lead by example—fostering unity, fairness, and respect for all citizens.

The outcome of the parliamentary ethics committee investigation will undoubtedly be closely watched, as it will set a precedent for how political figures are held accountable for their actions and words.

Source: Citizen Online

Follow Joburg ETC on Facebook, Twitter , TikTok and Instagram

For more News in Johannesburg, visit joburgetc.com