Connect with us

News

SAPS Crime Intelligence Official Denied Security Clearance Amid Fraud Allegations

Published

on

SAPS Crime Intelligence fraud
Sourced: IPUSA

Background of the Case

The South African Police Service (SAPS) finds itself under intense scrutiny as one of its senior Crime Intelligence officials, Nozipho Precious Madondo, battles the courts over allegations of fraud and corruption. Madondo, head of analysis and coordination in Crime Intelligence, is currently out on R10,000 bail along with six other SAPS officials, including Crime Intelligence head Dumisani Khumalo.

The charges revolve around the irregular appointment of Dineo Mokwele to the rank of brigadier, a senior position, despite claims that Mokwele lacked the required experience. Madondo is accused of playing a key role in facilitating this controversial appointment.

Bail Relaxation Opposed by State

Madondo appeared in Pretoria Magistrate’s Court seeking to have her bail conditions relaxed. The state strongly opposed the move, presenting the affidavit of investigating officer Brian Padayachee, which painted a troubling picture.

According to Padayachee, Madondo repeatedly failed to secure a top-secret security clearance, a mandatory requirement for her senior role in Crime Intelligence. The security vetting panel concluded that her past dishonesty and criminal conduct rendered her unsuitable for the position.

Notably, Madondo was previously convicted of assault with intent to commit grievous bodily harm, in a case involving allegations of torturing a member of the public. She later applied to have this criminal record expunged.

Questions Raised by Prosecutors

The prosecution raised two pressing concerns:

  1. Why would Madondo seek to return to Crime Intelligence, a workplace where many witnesses to the alleged offences are based, before being exonerated?

  2. Why pursue a role requiring top-secret clearance, which she does not possess, knowing her prior record would disqualify her?

Padayachee argued that Madondo still holds access to Crime Intelligence files and records, which could make her aware of other ongoing investigations in which she might be implicated.

Transfer to KwaZulu-Natal

To mitigate potential risks, the SAPS transferred Madondo back to her home province of KwaZulu-Natal, where she serves as acting district commissioner for iLembe. The state expressed concerns that a return to Crime Intelligence could lead to interference with witnesses or tampering with evidence.

“The likelihood of witness interference or destruction of evidence is real,” Padayachee’s affidavit read. “There are no exceptional circumstances warranting her return to Crime Intelligence.”

Public and Social Media Reaction

The case has sparked reactions across social media, with many South Africans expressing shock and dismay that a senior SAPS official could be implicated in alleged corruption while holding a sensitive position. Some commentators questioned the vetting and oversight processes within Crime Intelligence, highlighting the tension between accountability and internal promotion in the police service.

Others noted the broader implications for trust in SAPS, particularly when senior officials face serious allegations yet remain employed in critical divisions.

Legal and Institutional Context

South Africa’s Crime Intelligence division is tasked with protecting national security and gathering sensitive intelligence. Security clearance is not merely proceduralit is essential to maintain integrity, confidentiality, and operational effectiveness. Cases like Madondo’s raise concerns about internal controls and transparency in senior appointments.

What Happens Next

The court has yet to rule on Madondo’s request for bail relaxation. In the meantime, she remains barred from accessing any Crime Intelligence offices or facilities, and her ongoing involvement in the department remains strictly limited.

Observers say the case highlights the delicate balance between individual rights, internal police accountability, and public trust in law enforcement institutions. How SAPS handles senior officials under investigation could set a precedent for transparency and ethical governance in the service.

{Source: The Citizen}

Follow Joburg ETC on Facebook, Twitter , TikTok and Instagram

For more News in Johannesburg, visit joburgetc.com