Trump’s New Refugee Cap Sparks Outrage As US Prioritises White South Africans

A Sharp Turn In America’s Refugee Policy

In a move that’s reignited debate over race and immigration, the United States has announced it will admit just 7,500 refugees in the upcoming fiscal year the lowest figure in modern history. The new policy, unveiled by the Trump administration, gives overwhelming priority to white South Africans, particularly Afrikaners, marking a dramatic shift in who America considers “at risk.”

This represents a stunning drop from the 100,000-plus refugees welcomed annually under former President Joe Biden. According to a White House memo, the admissions “shall primarily be allocated among Afrikaners from South Africa and other victims of illegal or unjust discrimination in their respective homelands.”

The decision comes just months after a group of around 50 Afrikaners arrived in the US for resettlement. President Donald Trump has described their situation in South Africa as “terrible” and even likened it to “genocide,” a claim widely disputed by both local analysts and international observers.

Critics Say The Move Betrays America’s Humanitarian Values

Human rights organisations have condemned the administration’s decision, warning that it undermines decades of US leadership in global refugee protection.

“For more than four decades, the US refugee program has been a lifeline for families fleeing war, persecution and repression,” said Krish O’Mara Vignarajah, president of Global Refuge. “Concentrating the vast majority of admissions on one group erodes the credibility of the entire program.”

Aaron Reichlin-Melnick from the American Immigration Council called the change “a downfall for a crown jewel of America’s humanitarian efforts,” pointing out that since 1980, more than two million refugees have found safety in the US until now.

South African Context: Fact Or Fiction?

In South Africa, the policy has been met with confusion and disbelief. While Trump insists that Afrikaners are facing persecution, the South African government has long rejected this narrative.

Whites, who make up roughly 7.3% of the country’s population, still hold significant economic power, owning nearly two-thirds of the farmland and earning three times the average income of Black South Africans.

The notion of “white genocide” popular among far-right circles in the US has been dismissed by experts as a myth that distorts the reality of crime and inequality in South Africa for political gain.

Public Reaction: “A Step Backwards”

The announcement has lit up social media, with many users accusing the US of racial bias. One post on X read, “America has gone from welcoming refugees fleeing bombs to welcoming those fleeing equality.”

Others argue that prioritising one racial group over millions fleeing war in Sudan, Venezuela, and Afghanistan betrays the moral foundation of the refugee system itself.

A Shift With Global Implications

Beyond symbolism, the policy carries tangible consequences. By stripping Temporary Protected Status (TPS) from Afghans, Haitians, and Venezuelans, and drastically reducing admissions from conflict zones, the US risks ceding its role as a global humanitarian leader.

Trump’s defenders claim the change is about “protecting American interests,” but critics counter that it exposes an administration willing to redefine compassion along racial lines.

As one immigration advocate put it: “This isn’t just a refugee policy. It’s a message about who America believes deserves saving.”

{Source:EWN}

Follow Joburg ETC on Facebook, Twitter , TikTok and Instagram

For more News in Johannesburg, visit joburgetc.com