Connect with us

News

A Sigh of Relief for SA’s Sugar Belt as Government Holds Off on Tax Hike

Published

on

Pichulik
Source : {https://x.com/ANCParliament/status/1947986374251954682/photo/1}

In a decision that has brought a measure of relief to the heart of South Africa’s sugar belt, the government has opted not to increase the Health Promotion Levy (commonly known as the sugar tax) in the latest Medium-Term Budget Policy Statement (MTBPS). For an industry teetering on the brink of an unprecedented crisis, this pause on a new financial burden is a vital, if temporary, reprieve.

The announcement was welcomed by farming bodies who are grappling with a far more immediate threat: a deluge of heavily subsidized foreign sugar that is systematically displacing local product from supermarket shelves.

A Crisis Fueled by Imports, Not Just Taxes

While the sugar tax itself has long been a point of contention, the landscape has dramatically shifted. According to Higgins Mdluli, Chairman of SA Canegrowers, the industry is now facing a 400% increase in imported sugar.

“This year, 149,000 tons and counting of imported sugar will undoubtedly have a dramatic effect on the industry’s ability to remain a stable employer in rural Mpumalanga and KwaZulu-Natal,” Mdluli stated. He warned that any increase in the sugar tax would have worsened an “already dire situation” by making local sugar even less competitive for beverage producers.

The human cost of this market shift is stark. The industry supports an estimated million livelihoods and is a primary employer in regions with few other opportunities. The fear is that the influx of cheap imports will trigger widespread job losses, echoing the 16,000 jobs lost in the sugar tax’s first year alone.

A Call for Structural Support, Not Just Tax Restraint

The industry’s relief is tempered by a call for more proactive government intervention. Andrew Russell, Vice-Chair of SA Canegrowers, reiterated the call for the government to scrap the sugar tax entirely and, more urgently, to adjust tariff policies to “keep up with global realities” and protect local growers from unfair international competition.

Their position is that the tax has failed to prove its intended health benefits. “Since the sugar tax has been in place, no data or studies have been provided that show it has had any impact on reducing obesity levels,” Mdluli noted.

The broader agricultural sector also found positive signals in the MTBPS. Wandile Sihlobo, Chief Economist at Agbiz, welcomed the government’s reinforced focus on structural reforms, noting that the sector’s long-term growth depends on “better-maintained roads, functioning rail, efficient water systems, efficient ports, and better-functioning municipalities.”

For now, the sugar cane growers of KZN and Mpumalanga can breathe a little easier. But the message to policymakers is clear: stopping a tax hike is a helpful first step, but saving a foundational rural industry will require a much more robust and strategic defense.

{Source: IOL}

Follow Joburg ETC on Facebook, Twitter , TikTok and Instagram

For more News in Johannesburg, visit joburgetc.com