Culture Craze
Taylor Swift pulled into Blake Lively and Justin Baldoni’s escalating legal battle
What began as a few icy red carpet moments has now spiralled into one of Hollywood’s most uncomfortable legal standoffs, and Taylor Swift has unexpectedly found herself pulled into the centre of it.
The growing legal war between Blake Lively and Justin Baldoni, co-stars on the film adaptation of It Ends With Us, has moved far beyond creative tension. It now involves unsealed text messages, allegations of workplace misconduct, claims of public opinion manipulation, and a looming trial date set for May 18.
For fans who sensed something was off during the film’s press tour, the past few weeks have confirmed that the awkwardness was just the surface.
How private messages changed everything
The latest shock came in January when previously sealed court documents were made public. Among them were private messages that revealed Taylor Swift was acting as a close confidante to Lively during production.
In one message, Swift appeared to mock Baldoni’s behaviour, suggesting he knew trouble was coming. In another exchange, Lively allegedly asked Swift to publicly support her rewritten version of the script, even though Swift had not read it. Swift’s response, saying she would do anything for her, quickly went viral once revealed.
Baldoni’s legal team has seized on these messages, arguing they point to a coordinated effort by Lively and her inner circle to undermine his authority as director. They describe it as a calculated campaign designed to isolate him professionally and socially.
Harassment claims take centre stage
Alongside the text messages, Lively’s legal team has laid out serious allegations about what they describe as a hostile work environment on set.
They claim Baldoni crossed professional boundaries with an unscripted kiss and revisited concerns about Lively’s weight after pregnancy in a way they argue amounted to body shaming. Baldoni has previously defended the weight discussion as a safety concern linked to a lifting scene, citing back health precautions.
These claims form a significant part of Lively’s lawsuit, which seeks $160 million in damages.
The fight over public opinion
At the heart of the legal dispute is an accusation that extends beyond the film set and into the digital world. Lively’s team alleges that Baldoni and Wayfarer Studios hired crisis management firms to quietly influence public sentiment online.
According to the lawsuit, the wave of TikTok criticism aimed at Lively during the film’s release, particularly backlash over her promoting a haircare brand while marketing a film about domestic violence, was not organic. Instead, they argue it was artificially amplified through coordinated online campaigns, a tactic often referred to as astroturfing.
Baldoni’s defence firmly denies this, maintaining that the criticism was a natural reaction to Lively’s own promotional choices and public messaging.
A divided cast and a bigger cultural reckoning
The tension appears not to have been limited to the film’s leads. Leaked emails suggest co-star Jenny Slate also raised concerns, describing the atmosphere on set as disturbing and questioning Baldoni’s public image as an ally.
As the trial approaches, the potential witness list reads like a Hollywood awards ceremony. Ryan Reynolds, Gigi Hadid, Hugh Jackman, and Taylor Swift herself could be called to testify, not about the film’s plot, but about the culture surrounding its production.
Beyond the celebrity names, the case has sparked broader conversations online about power dynamics on film sets, image management in the age of social media, and how quickly public narratives can be shaped or distorted.
For now, the industry is watching closely. What started as a few uncomfortable silences on the red carpet has become a legal showdown that could reshape how Hollywood handles conflict, accountability, and influence behind the scenes.
Follow Joburg ETC on Facebook, Twitter, TikT
For more News in Johannesburg, visit joburgetc.com
Source: IOL
Featured Image: AOL.com
