Grand Jury Rebuff: Democrats Avoid Charges After Urging Military to Refuse “Illegal Orders”

In a sharp rebuke to the Justice Department and President Donald Trump, a federal grand jury in Washington has refused to indict six Democratic lawmakers over a social media video that urged service members to reject illegal orders. The decision, reported by major U.S. outlets, spares the officialsall with military or intelligence backgroundsfrom potential jail time, despite Trump’s public demands for severe punishment.

The 90-second video, posted in November, featured Representatives Mark Kelly (Arizona), Elissa Slotkin (Michigan), Jason Crow (Colorado), Chris Deluzio and Chrissy Houlahan (Pennsylvania), and Maggie Goodlander (New Hampshire). It called on troops to uphold their oath by refusing unlawful commands, without specifying any particular order. The message struck a nerve in a second term where Trump has aggressively deployed the military domestically for immigration enforcement and conducted lethal strikes abroad.

“Simply Quoted the Law”: The Defense

Following the grand jury’s dismissal, Slotkin stated on Instagram that the video “simply quoted the law,” adding she hoped it would end “this politicised investigation for good.” The Washington Post noted the rarity of such an outcome, as prosecutors typically need only show “probable cause”a low legal thresholdto secure an indictment from a grand jury. The panel’s refusal suggests they found insufficient grounds to pursue charges, which Trump had labeled “SEDITION AT THE HIGHEST LEVEL” and claimed was “punishable by DEATH!”

A Broader Political Confrontation

The video ignited a fierce response beyond the Justice Department. The Pentagon had even floated the possibility of a court-martial for Kelly, a former astronaut and Navy captain, signaling an unprecedented militarization of political dissent. In November, Democrats also accused the Trump administration of using the FBI to “intimidate” them after the agency requested interviews following their criticism.

The grand jury’s decision is more than a legal verdict; it’s a political checkpoint. It highlights the tensions between a president leaning heavily on military authority and legislators invoking constitutional and military law to check that power. While the immediate legal threat to the six lawmakers has dissolved, the clash underscores the deepening fractures over the role of the military in domestic politics and the boundaries of permissible dissent in Trump’s America. For now, the law they quoted appears to have shielded them.

{Source: IOL}

Follow Joburg ETC on Facebook, Twitter , TikTok and Instagram

For more News in Johannesburg, visit joburgetc.com