Why South African Businesses Should Think Twice Before Forcing Staff Back to the Office

South African companies eager to end remote work arrangements have been put on notice. A recent Labour Court decision has made it clear: telling employees to pack up their laptops and head back to their desks isn’t as simple as sending an email.

A Post Pandemic Workplace Reality

When the Covid-19 pandemic forced businesses to adopt remote work in 2020, few expected the change to last. Yet, five years later, many employees – and their employers – have found value in flexible work models. From reduced commuting costs to better work-life balance, hybrid and remote setups have become part of South Africa’s workplace culture.

But as more companies call staff back to the office, legal pitfalls are emerging. The recent Labour Court case involving Medici Energy and a long-serving employee from Paarl has brought these challenges into sharp focus.

The Case that Sparked a Warning

The employee, who had been working remotely for over two years due to her son’s autoimmune condition, was suddenly told to return to the company’s Cape Town office. The instruction came just a day after she requested a grievance form to lodge a complaint against two managers.

When she refused to comply, citing her ongoing circumstances, she was fired for gross insubordination.

The Commission for Conciliation, Mediation and Arbitration (CCMA) later ruled the dismissal both procedurally and substantively unfair, awarding her eight months’ salary in compensation. Medici Energy tried to overturn that decision in the Labour Court but lost.

What the Court Found

The court determined that while the employer’s instruction to return to the office may have been lawful, it was not reasonable. There was no pressing operational reason to end the remote work arrangement, and the lack of consultation or consideration of her personal situation raised serious concerns.

Even more troubling, evidence suggested that the company had already decided to dismiss her before the disciplinary process began. The court criticised the employer for:

• Failing to provide proper notice or consultation

• Denying her preferred representation during the hearing

• Preventing access to information on other charges brought against her

In short, the process was flawed from the start.

A Warning to Employers

Labour law specialists from Bowmans say the ruling is a cautionary tale for any business contemplating a return-to-office mandate.

“An instruction to return to the office must be reasonable and follow a fair process of consultation,” says Bowmans senior associate Amandla Makhongwana. “In some cases, changing work arrangements without agreement may even amount to altering the terms of employment.”

This means employers need more than just a preference for in-person work. They need a justifiable operational reason and a paper trail showing that they engaged meaningfully with affected staff.

The Bigger Picture

The pandemic has reshaped South Africa’s workplace culture, embedding remote and hybrid work into the fabric of many industries. Forcing a sudden return to the office not only risks legal trouble but also risks alienating employees in an already competitive talent market.

As the law stands, businesses have the right to call staff back – but only if they do it fairly, transparently and for legitimate reasons. Otherwise, they may find themselves in the same position as Medici Energy: defending an expensive and reputation-damaging dismissal in court.

Source:Business Tech 

Follow Joburg ETC on Facebook, Twitter , TikTok and Instagram

For more News in Johannesburg, visit joburgetc.com