US-South Africa Tensions Flare Over Claims of Racial Land Seizures Ahead of Ramaphosa-Trump Meeting

Tensions between South Africa and the United States are escalating just hours before President Cyril Ramaphosa is due to meet President Donald Trump in Washington. At the heart of the controversy are claims made by US Senator Marco Rubio, who insists that white South African farmers are being persecuted and stripped of their land on the basis of race.

Rubio, speaking during a Senate Foreign Relations Committee hearing, defended a recent US move to accept a group of 49 Afrikaner farmers as refugees—an action that has sparked widespread debate and criticism.

Rubio Faces Pushback in Heated Senate Debate

Rubio’s comments came in response to Democratic Senator Tim Kaine, who questioned the motivations behind giving special refugee status to a group of Afrikaners while other vulnerable populations remain sidelined. Kaine rejected the notion of white South Africans facing targeted persecution as “completely specious,” especially given that the Democratic Alliance (DA)—a party seen as representing many Afrikaners—is now part of South Africa’s Government of National Unity (GNU).

Kaine also pointed out that the DA’s leader, John Steenhuisen, holds a significant cabinet post as the Minister of Agriculture and is part of the delegation currently visiting Washington with President Ramaphosa.

A Preferential Policy?

The senator further highlighted inconsistencies in the US refugee policy. While Afrikaner farmers have been granted access under a special program, Kaine noted, persecuted communities in Afghanistan, Cuba, Nicaragua, and Venezuela have not received similar treatment.

“Why prioritise Afrikaner farmers over millions of others suffering globally?” Kaine asked. Rubio argued that the refugee group is small and manageable, and that their issue had been specifically identified by President Trump.

Rubio doubled down, saying, “These individuals have gone through every required check. They believe they are being persecuted, and they come from a country where land is taken on a racial basis.”

A Sensitive Subject for South Africa

The South African government has strongly rejected the refugee narrative. On Monday, the Department of International Relations and Cooperation (DIRCO) said that the 49 Afrikaners who arrived in the US are not officially refugees.

Their departure, reportedly on a chartered flight from OR Tambo International Airport arranged by Omni Air International, is being linked to a Trump-backed relocation offer for individuals who claim they face discrimination in South Africa.

Historical Contradictions Called Out

Kaine further pointed out the hypocrisy of offering a relocation program now, when the US had never extended such a program to Black South Africans during the apartheid era, when real state-sanctioned racial oppression occurred.

The debate reveals not only contrasting views on South Africa’s internal dynamics but also the politically charged lens through which some in Washington view the country’s land reform efforts.

As President Ramaphosa prepares for high-level talks with Trump, the controversy over Afrikaner refugee claims threatens to overshadow broader diplomatic and trade discussions. With AGOA trade benefits, foreign investment, and geopolitical partnerships on the line, South Africa is heading into these talks under a fresh spotlight—one shaped as much by perception as by policy.

{Source: IOL}

Follow Joburg ETC on Facebook, Twitter , TikTok and Instagram

For more News in Johannesburg, visit joburgetc.com