News
China and the EU move closer to resolving the electric vehicle trade dispute
After months of tension over electric vehicle imports, China and the European Union appear to be choosing dialogue over escalation. In a move that signals cooler heads and economic pragmatism, both sides have agreed on a framework that could defuse one of the most closely watched trade disputes in the global green economy.
At the heart of the development is a shared commitment to work within World Trade Organisation rules. Instead of retaliatory tariffs and drawn-out litigation, the focus has shifted to price undertakings. These allow Chinese electric vehicle exporters to commit to minimum export prices when selling into the EU market, addressing European concerns around subsidisation without closing the door to trade.
For industries on both sides, this matters. Electric vehicles sit at the intersection of climate policy, industrial strategy, and geopolitical competition. Any disruption ripples far beyond showrooms and factory floors.
A turn toward negotiation rather than punishment
China’s Ministry of Commerce has framed the agreement as constructive and stabilising. Officials have pointed to strong support from business communities in both regions, who have been calling for predictability amid rising global uncertainty.
The message from Beijing has been clear. This is not just about cars. It is about maintaining confidence in supply chains and showing that even politically sensitive trade disputes can be handled through consultation rather than confrontation.
In Europe, the tone has been more technical but no less significant. The European Commission has released detailed guidance explaining how Chinese exporters can avoid countervailing duties by submitting acceptable price undertaking proposals. These undertakings would set minimum import prices designed to offset the effects of alleged state subsidies.
How the EU’s price undertakings would work
Under the Commission’s framework, any proposal from Chinese manufacturers must meet strict legal and technical standards. These include clarity on which products are covered, how prices are set, expected sales volumes, and how vehicles will be distributed within the EU.
There are also safeguards to prevent cross-compensation between models or markets, and in some cases, exporters can outline future investment plans in Europe. These commitments must be specific and open to monitoring, reflecting the EU’s insistence on enforceability.
Minimum prices can be calculated in two main ways. One approach adjusts historical cost, insurance, and freight data to reflect the relevant duty margin. Another benchmark is the price of comparable electric vehicles manufactured within the EU that do not benefit from subsidies.
Officials in Brussels have indicated that simpler undertakings, covering fewer models and straightforward sales channels, will be easier to approve and oversee.
Why this dispute started in the first place
The current breakthrough follows a decision in October 2024 when the European Commission imposed definitive countervailing duties on Chinese battery electric vehicles. These ranged from 7.8 percent to 35.3 percent after an anti-subsidy investigation concluded that state support distorted competition.
Even then, both sides left the door open to alternatives that complied with WTO rules. Price undertakings emerged as the most realistic compromise, allowing the EU to protect its market while avoiding an outright trade war with one of its largest economic partners.
Chinese exporters can submit offers either individually or as a group. Each proposal will be assessed on its own merits, with input from stakeholders and final approval resting with EU member states. Importantly, the Commission has warned that failure to comply could lead to the withdrawal of undertakings and retroactive duties.
Industry reaction and what it means globally
The China Chamber of Commerce to the EU has welcomed the outcome, describing it as a step toward greater trade stability. From its perspective, the framework creates a more predictable environment for manufacturers and suppliers already operating in Europe, while leaving room for cooperation on technology and market growth.
Beyond the immediate case, there is a wider signal at play. At a time when industrial policy and the green transition are reshaping global commerce, China and the EU are showing that managed competition is still possible.
For consumers, automakers, and policymakers alike, this approach could set a template. It suggests that even as countries push to protect strategic industries, there is still space for rules-based negotiation rather than economic brinkmanship.
Follow Joburg ETC on Facebook, Twitter, TikT
For more News in Johannesburg, visit joburgetc.com
Source: IOL
Featured Image: A News
