“480 days is too long”: EFF takes Phala Phala fight to Constitutional Court steps

In the heart of Braamfontein, where some of South Africa’s most important legal battles have played out, a different kind of pressure is building, this time from the streets.

The Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF) is set to protest outside the Constitutional Court of South Africa, demanding answers over what it calls an unacceptable delay in the long-awaited Phala Phala judgment.

For the party, the message is simple: justice delayed is becoming justice denied.

Why this protest matters

At the centre of the demonstration is the unresolved case involving President Cyril Ramaphosa and the controversial Phala Phala sagaan issue that has hovered over South African politics for years.

The case before the court, Economic Freedom Fighters v Speaker of the National Assembly and Others, examines how Parliament handled the matter.

It’s not just a technical legal dispute. For many, it goes to the core of accountability at the highest level of government.

A delay that’s raising eyebrows

According to EFF leaders, more than 480 days have passed since the matter was heardfar exceeding the judiciary’s own informal benchmark of delivering judgments within about three months.

Gauteng chairperson Nkululeko Dunga has been outspoken about the delay, arguing that it raises serious concerns about transparency and the functioning of the justice system.

The protest, scheduled for 10am, is expected to draw supporters who share the party’s frustration.

Malema’s letter turns up the heat

EFF leader Julius Malema has already escalated the matter beyond public protest.

In a letter addressed to Chief Justice Mandisa Maya, Malema questioned why the ruling has taken so long and warned that the delay could erode public trust in the judiciary.

It’s a rare moment where political pressure is being directed not just at governmentbut at the courts themselves.

Public reaction: frustration and caution

On social media, the debate has been intense.

Some South Africans agree that the delay is troubling, arguing that high-profile cases should be resolved swiftly to maintain confidence in democratic institutions.

“If ordinary people must wait, it’s one thingbut this is a national issue,” one user posted.

Others, however, have urged caution, noting that Constitutional Court matters are often complex and require careful deliberation.

“We want justice, but we also want the right judgment,” another commenter wrote.

The divide reflects a broader tension between urgency and due process.

The Phala Phala backdrop

The Phala Phala controversy, linked to allegations involving foreign currency at Ramaphosa’s private farm, has been one of the most politically charged issues in recent years.

While various investigations and parliamentary processes have attempted to address it, the absence of a final ruling from the Constitutional Court has left a lingering sense of unfinished business.

For opposition parties like the EFF, that gap is more than proceduralit’s symbolic of accountability still in question.

A test for institutions

South Africa’s Constitutional Court has long been seen as a pillar of democracy, often stepping in to resolve politically sensitive matters.

But this moment places the court itself under scrutiny.

Can it maintain its reputation for independence and authority while facing growing public and political pressure?

What happens next

As protesters gather outside Constitutional Hill, the spotlight will be firmly on the judiciary.

Whether the demonstration speeds up the processor simply adds to the noiseremains to be seen.

But one thing is clear: in a country where institutions are constantly tested, timing matters almost as much as the ruling itself.

Because in the court of public opinion, waiting too long can become its own kind of verdict.

{Source: IOL}

Follow Joburg ETC on Facebook, Twitter , TikTok and Instagram

For more News in Johannesburg, visit joburgetc.com