EFF Moves to Appeal Julius Malema Hate Speech Verdict

The Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF) have confirmed they will challenge the Equality Court ruling that found their leader, Julius Malema, guilty of hate speech. The decision stems from remarks he made at the EFF Western Cape 3rd national people’s assembly in October 2022.

The court concluded that some of Malema’s statements, including “This is a war between white supremacy and black consciousness, you must know the two will never meet” and “Racism is violence and violence can only be ended by violence,” demonstrated a clear intention to incite harm.

EFF Responds to the Ruling

In a statement, the EFF argued that Section 16 of the Constitution protects freedom of expression, especially political speech. They cited past cases, including Malema’s trial for singing “Kill the Boer,” which acknowledged heightened protections for political discourse in a democratic society.

The party described the ruling as an attack on democratic space and the right to articulate revolutionary politics. It added that revolutionary language cannot be “sanitised to comfort the sensitivities of those who continue to enjoy the fruits of colonial dispossession.”

The EFF confirmed that lawyers have been instructed to take the matter to the Supreme Court of Appeals. The party framed the appeal as a defence of political freedom, historical truth, and the right of oppressed communities to speak against systemic injustices.

Political Reactions

The ruling drew praise from opposition parties. The Democratic Alliance called it a victory for the Constitution, the rule of law, and South Africans who value a non-racial society. The DA accused Malema of inciting violence and division, saying his actions have threatened South Africa’s social fabric.

The Freedom Front Plus echoed the sentiment, emphasizing that hate speech and racial division are unacceptable. The party warned against using context as an excuse for inflammatory language, insisting that speech reflects the speaker’s true intentions.

Context and Implications

This ruling has sparked nationwide debate about the balance between political expression and hate speech in South Africa. Legal analysts note that the case could set a precedent on how courts evaluate politically charged statements. Social media has been abuzz, with supporters of both the EFF and opposition parties weighing in.

Observers highlight that South Africa’s history of racial oppression makes the line between political rhetoric and incitement particularly sensitive. Many see the case as a test of the country’s commitment to both freedom of expression and protection against hate speech.

{Source: TheSouthAfrican}

Follow Joburg ETC on Facebook, Twitter , TikTok and Instagram

For more News in Johannesburg, visit joburgetc.com