Court Blocks Finance Minister’s Unilateral VAT Powers In Landmark Ruling

A major court ruling has reshaped the debate around how taxes are set in South Africa, with judges declaring that the finance minister cannot change the value-added tax rate without proper parliamentary oversight.

The decision follows a legal challenge brought by the Democratic Alliance after Finance Minister Enoch Godongwana attempted to raise VAT from 15% to 15.5% during the 2025 national budget process.

For many South Africans already grappling with rising living costs, the case quickly became about more than just tax. It touched on questions of accountability, transparency and who really holds the power to decide how much the public pays.

Court Says Tax Powers Must Rest With Parliament

The Western Cape High Court ruled that the existing provision allowing the finance minister to adjust VAT rates was unconstitutional.

According to the court, the core issue was not whether the minister was capable of setting tax rates. Instead, it centred on whether Parliament is allowed to hand over such authority to the executive.

Judges found that the Constitution places the power to impose, reduce or abolish taxes firmly in the hands of Parliament. Allowing the executive branch to effectively bypass the established money bill process, they said, undermines that principle.

The court also highlighted a practical concern. Even though Parliament technically has 12 months to review and confirm a VAT increase introduced by the minister, reversing such a decision later would not help taxpayers who had already paid the higher tax during that period.

In simple terms, once the money has been collected, it would be almost impossible for ordinary citizens to get it back.

Political Parties Welcome The Decision

Both the Democratic Alliance and the Economic Freedom Fighters welcomed the ruling, seeing it as a victory for parliamentary oversight.

DA Federal Council Chair Helen Zille said the judgment reinforces accountability in the country’s fiscal decision making.

She argued that the party had been correct to challenge the attempted VAT increase, insisting that it was unconstitutional for the minister to introduce such a change without full legislative approval.

The case, she said, confirmed the importance of following the correct constitutional procedures when it comes to decisions that affect the national purse.

What Happens Next

While the ruling marks a significant legal milestone, the matter is not completely settled.

The High Court’s declaration that Section 7(4) of the VAT Act is invalid must still be confirmed by the Constitutional Court before it becomes final.

In the meantime, Parliament has been given 24 months to amend the VAT Act so that it aligns with constitutional requirements.

Why The Decision Matters For South Africans

VAT remains one of the most important revenue sources for the South African government, funding everything from social grants to infrastructure and public services.

Because it is a consumption tax paid on most goods and services, any change to the rate has an immediate impact on households and businesses.

The court’s decision means that future attempts to raise or reduce VAT will have to pass through Parliament using the full legislative process. This ensures that elected representatives debate the proposal publicly before it takes effect.

For a country where economic pressures and political debates around taxation are growing louder, the ruling signals a shift toward stronger checks and balances in how fiscal decisions are made.

{Source: EWN}

Follow Joburg ETC on Facebook, Twitter , TikTok and Instagram

For more News in Johannesburg, visit joburgetc.com