Free State Nurse Wins R342k Payout After HIV Med Theft Case Falls Apart, Court Slams Lack of Evidence

Free State Nurse Wins R342k Payout After HIV Med Theft Case Falls Apart

After years of fighting to clear her name, a Bloemfontein nurse who was accused of stealing HIV medication has walked away victorious and compensated. Nontuthuzelo Thokozile Taioe, who served the MUCPP Community Health Centre for over a decade, will now receive a full year’s salary, roughly R342,000 following a Labour Court ruling that overturned her dismissal.

The judgment lands as a reminder of how fragile justice can be when workplace discipline relies on assumption rather than proof. For Taioe, it marks the end of a long and painful chapter that began in June 2018, when police stormed a property linked to her family, broke open a locked room, and found ARV medication inside.

But here’s the twist none of the evidence ever proved that the medicine was hers.

A Career Cut Short Over Unproven Claims

Taioe joined the health centre back in 2008, dedicating her life to patient care. By 2021, she was earning just over R28,500 a month, when the hammer fell dismissal for alleged theft of 11 boxes containing 69 bottles of Odimune, each bottle stacked with 28 ARV pills.

The accusation was serious: if true, it wouldn’t only be theft it would mean depriving patients who rely on these life-saving drugs.

But inside the Labour Court, the case didn’t hold up. There were no stock lists, no pharmacy shortages reported, no proof the medicine came from the clinic, and not a single pharmacy manager testified. Even then, the internal inquiry still ruled against her.

As South Africans often say when something doesn’t add up, “Go kae evidence?”

The Mysterious Room and the Medication No One Claimed

The ARVs weren’t found in Taioe’s home, they were found in a separate house on the shared property, about 20–30 metres away. Police broke into the room as no one had the keys. Taioe insisted she never stored medication there she said she’d asked her son to keep bags given to her by a gardener named Johannes, unaware of what was inside.

The husband claimed she had locked the room. The son told officers colleagues of his mother dropped the boxes off. Yet, in a strange procedural gap, he never took the stand, and no affidavit from him was submitted. The family said he was mentally challenged, a fact the arbitrator ignored and no effort was made to subpoena him.

Despite this loose evidence bundle, the arbitrator decided that because medication was found on a property linked to her, she was guilty. Even though the pills weren’t in her room, kitchen, or bedroom.

This is the kind of detail that usually sets Twitter/X ablaze with one-liners like:

“So she lost her job over ARVs found in the neighbour’s house that happens to share a fence?”
“Investigate the gardener, the son, anyone but proof is proof!”

Judge Gura Sets the Record Straight

In the Labour Court, Acting Judge Lindiwe Gura dismantled the initial ruling piece by piece. She noted:

• nothing proved the ARVs belonged to the hospital,

• no facility reported missing stock,

• no link between Taioe and the medication was proven,

• and without evidence of theft, disciplinary action could not stand.

In short: No proof, no case.

Judge Gura ruled the dismissal substantively unfair and ordered the health centre to pay Taioe a full year’s salary as compensation.

For many healthcare workers, especially nurses who often feel underpaid, overworked, and scapegoated the ruling hits home. It’s a win not just for Taioe, but for fairness in disciplinary processes.

A Bigger Conversation: Accountability vs Accusation

South Africans know the stigma around missing medication, especially ARVs. In public facilities, drug theft is a real crisis, and communities are quick to demand answers. But this case reminds us how easily suspicion can replace evidence, and how damaging that can be.

Taioe lost her job, her dignity, and three years of income over a claim that didn’t hold up in court.

Maybe the bigger question is: How many others may be condemned on weak grounds?

With the ruling now public, it won’t be surprising if labour forums, nursing unions, and healthcare professionals use this case as a talking point for reform, evidence-based hearings, and better procedural fairness.

{Source: IOL}

Follow Joburg ETC on Facebook, Twitter , TikTok and Instagram

For more News in Johannesburg, visit joburgetc.com