Pretoria Christian school investigated over controversial contract tying pupils to social media performances

A Pretoria school known for viral dance and music clips is facing intense scrutiny after a controversial agreement surfaced that allegedly ties pupils to years of social media content creation in exchange for education.

The Gauteng education department has launched an investigation into the matter, following allegations that some learners at the school were expected to “work off” their school fees by producing videos for platforms like TikTok and YouTube.

The controversy has sparked a heated debate online about children in entertainment, the boundaries between opportunity and exploitation, and how far schools should go in developing student talent.

@siyamangena_

Child influencer contracts.

♬ original sound – siyamangena

Viral fame raises uncomfortable questions

The school at the centre of the storm is Christian Progressive College, a Pretoria-based institution whose high-energy singing and dancing clips regularly rack up hundreds of thousands sometimes millions of views online.

Its social media presence is massive. The school reportedly has nearly three million followers on TikTok, where pupils appear in choreographed music and dance content.

At first glance, the videos look like harmless fun talented learners showcasing their creativity.

But according to reports and a leaked document, those performances may be linked to a formal agreement signed by parents whose children received bursaries.

That document titled Minor Artist Education, Bursary & Record Label Agreement allegedly gives the school extensive control over the participating children’s performances and earnings for a minimum of five years.

@christianprogressivecol3 New music 🚨 #christianprogressivecollege #fyp #cpcstars #godisgood #southafrica ♬ original sound – Christian Progressive College

The contract that triggered outrage

The agreement reportedly states that the school can provide education, accommodation, or both as part of a bursary.

However, these costs are described as “recoupable”, meaning they must eventually be repaid through the child’s income from performances or content creation.

According to the contract:

• The school allegedly takes up to 90% of income generated until the bursary costs are recovered.

• Learners may be tied into a five-year exclusivity period.

• The school has exclusive management rights over performances and recordings.

• Parents cannot independently negotiate bookings for their children.

Legal experts say the structure of the agreement resembles something closer to a record-label deal than a typical school bursary.

@limpopo_boy_1

♬ original sound – Limpopo_Boy RSA

Legal experts warn of possible exploitation

Attorney Paul Roelofse, who reviewed the document independently, said the agreement raised serious concerns.

He warned that the arrangement could blur the line between education and commercial exploitation.

According to Roelofse, the contract effectively ties education benefits to a child’s artistic output, meaning a learner’s schooling may depend on fulfilling performance obligations.

“This type of arrangement risks turning vulnerable families’ hopes for education into leverage over a child’s talent and future earnings,” he said.

Another legal professional, Uzukhanye Myoywana, said the agreement appears structured like a commercial entertainment contract.

He pointed to features such as exclusive management, financial recoupment clauses, and post-matric performance expectations.

Under South African law, minors are afforded strong protections when entering contracts especially those tied to employment or income.

Education department steps in

The Gauteng Department of Education confirmed that it has launched an inquiry into the allegations.

Spokesperson Steve Mabona said officials are examining whether the school violated children’s rights or breached registration conditions.

If wrongdoing is found, authorities may apply relevant legislation.

“The department condemns any violation of the rights of children and will not hesitate to act where exploitative practices are identified,” Mabona said.

Despite the controversy, the school was confirmed to be registered with authorities under the name Christian Progressive.

Critics call the contract “deeply troubling”

Education and arts figures have also weighed in.

Teachers’ union leader Basil Manuel said he was shocked after reviewing the contract.

“You cannot encumber a child like that,” he said, arguing that the agreement appears to bind learners even after they reach adulthood.

Veteran actress Lizz Meiring also criticised the arrangement, warning that parents sometimes sign questionable contracts because they hope their children will become famous.

“It’s always presented as an incredible opportunity,” she said. “But often it ends up being about money.”

Parents divided over the programme

Not everyone sees the situation the same way.

One parent said she removed her 14-year-old child from the school after the experience started feeling more like a job than an education.

“The focus shifted from learning to performance,” she said.

Another parent defended the programme, saying her child enjoyed the entertainment side of the school.

“He loves performing and we supported that,” she said, adding that parents voluntarily signed the agreements.

The school’s response

The school itself has not addressed the allegations directly.

Principal Zwelethu Ndhlovu declined to comment, referring media questions to education authorities.

However, in an internal memo to parents and staff, he suggested that social media criticism was being driven by people who opposed the school’s “holistic approach” to developing learners’ talents.

Meanwhile, the school’s entertainment division known as CPC Stars has defended its programme.

Manager Matome Robert Thoka, also known online as Limpopo Boy, said the children were not being exploited.

According to him, the programme involves about 21 learners and operates after school hours.

He said contracts were introduced after some learners began taking independent gigs without coordination from the programme’s management.

Why the story has struck a nerve

The controversy has resonated widely on South African social media.

Part of the reason is timing. Over the past decade, TikTok fame has created a new pathway to success for young creators but it has also raised questions about how children are protected in the influencer economy.

South African labour laws, particularly the Basic Conditions of Employment Act, place strict limits on child labour and include special provisions for children working in the arts.

These rules exist precisely because young performers are often vulnerable to long-term contracts or financial arrangements they do not fully understand.

The bigger question: talent development or exploitation?

For many observers, the situation highlights a deeper tension in modern education.

On one hand, schools increasingly encourage creative development especially in fields like music, dance and digital media.

On the other, when those activities generate real money and massive online audiences, the line between learning and labour becomes blurred.

As the investigation continues, the key question facing regulators is simple but important:

Where does opportunity end and exploitation begin?

For now, the answer may determine the future not just of one Pretoria school, but of how South Africa handles the rapidly growing world of child creators and social media fame.

{Source: IOL}

Follow Joburg ETC on Facebook, Twitter , TikTok and Instagram

For more News in Johannesburg, visit joburgetc.com