News
When Medical Aid Is Not Enough: The Rising Cost of Private Healthcare in South Africa
The bill that arrives after the trauma
For many South Africans, the shock no longer ends when the surgery is over. It lands days or weeks later in the form of a bill that medical aid does not fully cover. Patients and financial experts are raising the alarm as some doctors charge two, three, and in extreme cases up to five times the rates paid by medical aid schemes.
This growing gap between what schemes pay and what patients are charged is pushing families into debt, even when they believed they were properly insured. The practice is widely known as balance billing, and it is fast becoming a defining feature of private healthcare in the country.
A system under strain
According to Sanjith Hannuman, a director at AVIB, South Africa’s private healthcare sector is facing a crisis of trust. Patients already battling steep medical aid contributions are being hit with unexpected co-payments that can be financially devastating.
He describes fees of 200 percent, 300 percent, and even 500 percent above scheme rates as no longer unusual. What was once an occasional frustration has become routine for many patients navigating specialist care.
One surgery, lifelong debt
Hannuman shared the story of a Gauteng man who required emergency spinal surgery. While the operation saved his life, the bill nearly destroyed it. His specialist charged close to five times the medical aid rate, leaving him with an R85 000 shortfall. For a middle-class household, this kind of expense can mean draining retirement savings, refinancing a home, or taking on high-interest debt.
Stories like this circulate widely on patient advocacy forums and social media, where frustration and anger are growing. Many patients say they only learn about the true cost once they are already in a hospital bed, with little room to negotiate.
Why doctors can charge so much
The root of the problem lies in regulation. Since the National Health Reference Price List was set aside in 2010, there has been no binding fee structure for healthcare providers. Doctors are expected to charge fair and reasonable fees, but there is no clear definition of what that means and no effective enforcement.
The Council for Medical Schemes has acknowledged that co-payments are a major source of complaints and financial risk for members. The Health Professions Council of South Africa requires ethical billing but has limited power to act when fees soar far beyond benchmarks.
This regulatory gap has created space for wide variations in pricing, particularly among specialists.
The emotional cost of bill shock
Beyond the numbers, patients describe a deep sense of betrayal. The doctor-patient relationship relies on trust, especially during moments of vulnerability. When a life-threatening diagnosis is followed by financial ruin, that trust erodes quickly.
Hannuman argues that the system increasingly monetises vulnerability, turning moments of fear into profit opportunities. This comes at a time when medical aid contributions continue to rise faster than inflation and salary growth, placing quality private healthcare further out of reach for the middle class.
Doctors and the other side of the debate
Healthcare professionals point out that the issue is complex. A Durban-based doctor, who asked not to be named, said high out-of-pocket payments are often unavoidable under current funding models and that patients should protect themselves with gap cover.
The South African Medical Association has declined to comment directly, saying that above-tariff billing falls under the mandate of regulators rather than professional bodies.
Why gap cover is becoming essential
As specialist fees rise, gap cover is no longer seen as optional. Brian Harris from Turnberry Management Risk Solutions warns that medical aid alone increasingly leaves members exposed. Penalties for using non-designated hospitals and specialist charges above scheme rates are becoming more common, leaving patients to make up the difference.
For many households, gap cover is now the only buffer standing between a medical emergency and long-term financial damage.
What patients are really asking for
At the heart of the debate is a simple question. What is fair? Patients are not arguing against doctors earning a good living. They are questioning whether a brief follow-up consultation billed at four times the scheme rate reflects reasonable care.
Until clearer rules are put in place, South Africans are left navigating a private healthcare system where the true cost of care is often only revealed after it is too late to turn back.
Follow Joburg ETC on Facebook, Twitter, TikT
For more News in Johannesburg, visit joburgetc.com
Source: IOL
Featured Image: UMHS
