News
Trump Defends ICE Agent After Fatal Minneapolis Shooting as City Pushes Back
A shooting that has shaken Minneapolis and reignited a national debate
A fatal shooting involving a US immigration agent in Minneapolis has ignited fierce debate across the country, with sharply different versions of events now dominating headlines and timelines.
US President Donald Trump has publicly defended the Immigration and Customs Enforcement agent who shot and killed Renee Good during an altercation on Wednesday, saying the officer acted in self-defence after being run over by a vehicle.
The incident happened when federal immigration agents approached Good’s SUV on a Minneapolis street. Video footage circulating online shows an agent attempting to open the driver’s door before firing multiple shots as the vehicle moved forward.
What authorities say happened
According to the Department of Homeland Security, officers believed the vehicle posed an immediate threat. Officials alleged that Good tried to ram ICE agents as she attempted to drive away.
Trump said he had watched the footage himself and described it as deeply disturbing. Writing on his Truth Social platform, he claimed the driver was disorderly, resisted arrest, and violently ran over an ICE officer, prompting the shooting in what he called self-defence.
He also used the moment to criticise what he described as a radical left movement targeting immigration officers, calling for stronger protection of law enforcement.
Minneapolis officials challenge the federal account
The federal version of events was quickly disputed by local leadership. Minneapolis mayor Jacob Frey dismissed claims that the vehicle was used as a weapon, calling that narrative false in blunt terms that reflected the city’s growing frustration.
Minneapolis Police Chief Brian O’Hara offered a more measured briefing. He said the vehicle was blocking a road when federal agents approached, and it began to drive off shortly afterwards. At least two shots were fired, he confirmed, adding that local police are not leading the investigation, as the incident involves federal agents.
A family’s grief and a very different picture
Good’s family has rejected any suggestion that she posed a threat or was involved in anti-ICE protests. Her mother, Donna Ganger, said her daughter was likely terrified in the moment and described her as a deeply kind person.
That emotional response has resonated widely online, where many Americans are questioning how routine enforcement encounters escalate so quickly and so fatally. Social media platforms have been flooded with calls for body camera footage, independent oversight, and clearer rules around federal operations in cities.
Immigration enforcement under a harsher spotlight
The shooting comes amid an intensified immigration crackdown since Trump returned to the White House in January 2025. He has repeatedly vowed to deliver the largest deportation campaign in US history, with ICE raids expanding across major cities.
Democratic leaders have condemned these operations, accusing federal authorities of overreach and of turning migrants into political scapegoats. For cities like Minneapolis, the tension between local governance and federal enforcement has once again burst into the open.
Why this case matters beyond Minnesota
Beyond the tragedy itself, the Minneapolis shooting has become a flashpoint in a much bigger national argument about policing, immigration, and accountability. With video evidence circulating and public trust already fragile, the pressure for transparent investigations is only growing.
As the legal process unfolds, this case is likely to shape how future ICE operations are viewed, not just in Minnesota but across the United States.
Also read: Venezuela’s Oil Moment: Why the US Move Has the World Watching
Follow Joburg ETC on Facebook, Twitter, TikT
For more News in Johannesburg, visit joburgetc.com
Source: IOL
Featured Image: PBS
