US Sanctions on ANC Officials Seen as Inevitable Amid SA-US Tensions

SA-US Relations Strain Under Dispute Over Israel and Sovereignty

Relations between South Africa and the United States are at a tense low, with analysts predicting the standoff will persist for the next three years under the Trump administration. The friction centers on South Africa’s firm stance on Israel and national sovereignty, which continues to draw sharp criticism from Washington.

The dispute has intensified diplomatic exchanges, with US Senator Marco Rubio and South African Minister of International Relations Ronald Lamola trading pointed letters and public statements.

Targeted Sanctions on ANC Officials Likely

Experts warn that while full diplomatic rupture is unlikely, targeted sanctions and visa restrictions on certain ANC members are probable. Potentially affected individuals include:

• Naledi Pandor, former Minister of International Relations and Cooperation

• Ebrahim Rasool, former SA ambassador to the US

• Julius Malema, EFF leader

Political analysts argue that sanctions would serve to appease domestic US constituencies, particularly Afrikaner lobby groups, without fully severing economic or political ties.

Lamola Defends SA’s Sovereign Decisions

In response to Rubio’s criticisms, Lamola wrote:

“We do not seek your approval for our path. Our path is our own, chosen by our people and guided by our sovereign laws. But we do seek, and we will always extend, a hand of respectful partnership.”

The statement underscores South Africa’s commitment to independence in foreign policy while signalling willingness for dialogue.

Why the Tension Persists

The core issues go beyond Afrikaner concerns. South Africa’s legal and moral stance on Israel, particularly its support of a case at the International Court of Justice alleging potential genocide in Gaza, has placed Pretoria in direct opposition to Washington.

Independent commentator Dr Tshwale explains:

“The US will act first to impose on South Africa, seeking submission on its policy position. But it does seem SA isn’t prepared to submit because it believes it can’t compromise on principles.”

He adds that US sanctions are increasingly inevitable as congressional bills targeting senior ANC officials advance.

Potential Consequences for SA

Sanctions could have wider repercussions on South Africa’s international investment profile, particularly as Afrikaner advocacy groups lobby for US intervention. Dominic Maphaka from North-West University warns that while banning ministers outright is unlikely, further punitive measures from Washington are to be expected.

Social media reaction in South Africa has been mixed: some citizens express pride in Pretoria’s unwavering stance on sovereignty, while others fear the economic fallout of sanctions, especially in an already fragile economy.

Analysts agree that the SA-US relationship will remain strained for the foreseeable future. While cooperation is necessarygiven the US’s global influence and South Africa’s continental leadershiptensions over foreign policy principles, sovereignty, and Israel will shape diplomatic interactions.

South Africa appears prepared to stand firm, signalling that its foreign policy decisions will not be dictated by external pressures, even in the face of looming sanctions.

Ramaphosa Warns False Claims of White Persecution Threaten South Africa’s Unity

{Source: The Citizen}

Follow Joburg ETC on Facebook, Twitter , TikTok and Instagram

For more News in Johannesburg, visit joburgetc.com