Blue Lights, Black Marks: Political Shadows Loom Over Murder Case of SANDF Sergeant Swanton

The murder of South African Air Force Sergeant Michael Swanton has become more than a tragic crimeit is now a test of whether South Africa’s justice system can operate without political interference. With two VIP Protection officers linked to a sitting mayor accused of the killing, and a civil rights group launching a watching brief, the case has ignited fears of a two-tiered justice system.

Sergeant Swanton, 43, was shot dead on the R80 in Pretoria North on the evening of 28 January. He and his wife, also a SANDF member, were driving when a dark BMW SUV fitted with blue lights forced them to stop. Two men approached, questioned them about a missing number plate, and returned to their vehicle. When Swanton followed to verify their credentials, he was shot in the head. He died at the scene.

The Accused and Their Connections

Thabang Sohole, 41, and Michael Makampe, 42, are VIP Protection officers assigned to Madibeng Mayor Douglas Maimane. They handed themselves over hours after the shooting, claiming they were victims of an attempted hijacking. They were subsequently charged with murder, defeating the ends of justice, and impersonating police officers. Both were released on R20,000 baila decision that has drawn sharp criticism.

The case returns to the Pretoria Magistrate’s Court on 9 April.

AfriForum Steps In: A Watching Brief and Growing Unease

AfriForum’s Community Safety division has formally instructed its legal team to perform a watching brief in the case. Spokesperson Jacques Broodryk did not mince words: “Serious concerns have been raised about the apparent use of blue lights and conduct consistent with the impersonation of police officials, allegedly with the approval or knowledge of Mayor Maimane.”

The organisation’s intervention is driven by a fear that political connections will shield the accused from full accountability. “Where individuals who are politically connected stand accused of such a grave crime, the public is entitled to absolute transparency and an uncompromised judicial process,” Broodryk said. “The impression of political interference in criminal proceedings erodes public trust in the rule of law and creates the perception that there are two justice systems: one for the politically connected and one for ordinary citizens.”

Bail Decision Under Fire

Parliamentary Portfolio Committee on Police Chair Ian Cameron voiced disappointment at the granting of bail, citing “major irregularities” in the case. He pointed to the use of blue lights by non-law enforcement officers, a municipal R5 rifle, and seized handguns as evidence of “significant corrupt wrongdoing.”

“I understand bail is considered on its own merits,” Cameron said, “but the problem with this is that it touches on organised crime.”

The Question That Won’t Go Away

The Swanton murder case has all the ingredients of a classic South African scandal: a victim in uniform, accused with political connections, a powerful mayor’s name in the background, and a bail decision that defies public expectation. AfriForum’s watching brief is a symptom of a deeper diseasea widespread belief that in South Africa, justice is not blind, but simply looks the other way when it recognises the faces before it.

For the Swanton family, the legal process has only just begun. For a public weary of cases where power bends the law, the verdict will be measured not only in the courtroom, but in whether this case proves the cynics rightor, for once, wrong.

{Source: Citizen}

Follow Joburg ETC on Facebook, Twitter , TikTok and Instagram

For more News in Johannesburg, visit joburgetc.com