Court Overturns School’s Vaping Punishment: A Landmark Ruling for Learner Rights

Beyond the Vape Cloud: A Judge’s Ruling Forces Schools to Rethink Punishment

It’s the modern-day equivalent of being caught smoking behind the bike sheds. But when two boarding school learners were busted for vaping, the consequences spiraled far beyond a simple detention, leading to a landmark court ruling that has every principal and parent in the country taking note.

The Western Cape High Court didn’t just side with two teenagers; it delivered a powerful lesson to schools on the limits of authority and the meaning of fair play. The case revolved around two learners, known only as L and M, and their school’s escalating response to their vaping incidents.

From Suspension to Sanction: How Punishment Spun Out of Control

The first incident was fairly standard stuff. Back in Grade 8, the boys were caught with a vape stashed in a cupboard. The school’s code of conduct swung into action, resulting in a six-week suspension from the hostel. A stern punishment, but one that fit the crime.

The real trouble began a year later when they were caught again. This time, the school didn’t just expel them from the hostel a severe step in itself. The governing body then convened a second hearing for the same offence, layering on additional sanctions that struck at the core of their school lives: their leadership positions and crucially, their bursaries were stripped away.

For M’s father, the process felt less about correction and more about condemnation. Where was the appeal? Where was the path to redemption? His bewilderment turned to action, and the case landed on the desk of Judge Gayaat Salie.

The Court’s Verdict: Discipline vs. Humiliation

Judge Salie’s ruling was crystal clear. While she didn’t dismiss the seriousness of vaping, she took aim at the school’s “unlawful” and disproportionate response.

In a statement that should be printed and pinned to every SGB noticeboard, the Judge declared, “Discipline that humiliates learners cannot be justified academically and from a developmental perspective.”

The core of her argument was that the school had treated a disciplinary issue like a criminal trial, losing all sense of perspective. The goal of school discipline, she implied, is to build better citizens, not to break them.

The Bigger Conversation: What’s Fair?

This case is about more than just vaping. It touches a nerve for many parents who feel that school governing bodies sometimes wield their power arbitrarily, without checks and balances.

On social media, the reaction has been split. Some applaud the court for protecting children from excessive power, with comments like, “Schools are for teaching, not for doling out life-ruining punishments.” Others worry it ties the hands of educators, with one parent posting, “How are schools supposed to maintain order if the courts second-guess every decision?”

This ruling doesn’t give learners a free pass to misbehave. Instead, it draws a critical line in the sand. It reminds schools that their power must be exercised fairly, reasonably, and always with the ultimate goal of guiding a young person, not just punishing them. It’s a lesson in justice, served from the bench to the classroom.

{Source: IOL}

Follow Joburg ETC on Facebook, Twitter , TikTok and Instagram

For more News in Johannesburg, visit joburgetc.com