Zuma’s MK Party Takes Aim at ConCourt and Ramaphosa in Explosive Showdown

As legal drama intensifies, the MK party accuses the country’s highest court of turning a blind eye. But what does this political standoff really mean for South Africa?

South Africa’s political arena is once again ablaze with controversy, and this time, it’s not just a court ruling making headlines—it’s the growing feud between former president Jacob Zuma’s MK party and the Constitutional Court itself. The ruling last week may have cleared the way for President Cyril Ramaphosa to appoint Firoz Cachalia as acting police minister, but it’s ignited a war of words that’s far from over.

The Court Ruling That Lit the Fuse

Last Thursday, the Constitutional Court dismissed an urgent application brought by Zuma and the MK party to overturn Ramaphosa’s decision to place Police Minister Senzo Mchunu on leave, appoint Cachalia in his place, and establish a new commission of inquiry into policing.

The court’s response? The matter didn’t fall under its exclusive jurisdiction and didn’t warrant direct access. In essence, it told the MK party: take it elsewhere, for now.

But this technical legal reasoning didn’t sit well with Zuma’s camp.

MK Party’s Stinging Rebuttal

Soon after the ruling, MK party spokesperson Nhlamulo Ndhlela blasted the apex court, claiming it had shirked its constitutional duty by hiding behind procedural excuses.

“To the shock of most South Africans who believed the rule of law still prevails,” he said, “the Constitutional Court has unfortunately chosen to turn a blind eye and take the easy way out.”

For the MK party, this wasn’t just a lost court case—it was, in their words, a “missed opportunity to confront a constitutional crisis head-on.” They allege that the president’s actions, especially appointing a second police minister—are not only questionable but outright illegal.

The Ramaphosa Factor

At the heart of the MK party’s anger is President Ramaphosa’s decision to sideline Mchunu and fast-track Cachalia’s appointment. The party insists that this was a calculated move to protect Mchunu—described as a close Ramaphosa ally—from facing serious scrutiny over “criminal conduct.”

Tied to this are old wounds: the CR17 campaign funding saga and the still-simmering Phala Phala scandal. Both continue to cast long shadows over Ramaphosa’s presidency, especially among Zuma loyalists who feel justice has been inconsistently applied.

MK Party’s Next Moves: Protest and Pressure

Not content with legal routes alone, the MK party is now threatening political action and public mobilisation.

They’ve given Ramaphosa a deadline: resign by 10am this Friday, or prepare for further legal and public consequences. They also want answers to 15 detailed questions, covering everything from the legality of Cachalia’s appointment to the justification behind paying two police ministers.

In a bold declaration, they’ve promised peaceful demonstrations and are urging South Africans to rally behind what they call “a campaign to protect democracy.”

Where’s the Chief Justice?

Another focal point of MK’s frustration is the absence of a full explanation for the Constitutional Court’s decision. They’re now demanding that Chief Justice Mandisa Maya provide those reasons as a matter of urgency, suggesting a lack of transparency from the judiciary’s highest seat.

Public Reaction: Frustration, Fatigue, and Divided Loyalties

Across social media, reactions have been mixed. Some South Africans expressed weariness at the constant political drama, questioning whether any party truly serves the people anymore. Others, particularly Zuma supporters, echoed MK’s concerns about judicial impartiality.

For many, the optics of the ConCourt ruling, combined with Ramaphosa’s swift follow-through, feel suspicious, even if legally sound.

Zooming Out: What This All Tells Us

This episode is more than a procedural legal tussle. It’s the latest flare-up in South Africa’s ongoing battle over who controls the narrative around justice, accountability, and power.

For the Constitutional Court, it’s a test of its ability to remain above political fray while upholding its constitutional duties. For the MK party, it’s a platform to position themselves as the only opposition willing to hold Ramaphosa to account. And for the ANC as a whole, it’s another sign of internal fractures now being fought in the courts and on the streets.

The ball is in multiple courts now, literal and figurative. The MK party awaits responses from Ramaphosa and the Chief Justice. Meanwhile, Cachalia’s commission moves forward, and Ramaphosa’s office shows no sign of retreat.

But in a country where public trust in institutions has eroded, every move matters.

Expect more fireworks in the weeks ahead, especially with the MK party pushing for a motion of no confidence and planning further public demonstrations.

For now, one thing is certain: South Africa’s political soap opera is far from over and the stakes have never been higher.

{Source: The Citizen}

Follow Joburg ETC on Facebook, Twitter , TikTok and Instagram

For more News in Johannesburg, visit joburgetc.com