McKenzie hits back as inmate’s explosive claims spark legal showdown

From prison call to political storm

What started as a prison phone call has quickly spiralled into a full-blown political and media storm.

Gayton McKenzie is now preparing for legal action after a jailed man, Jermaine Prim, made a series of explosive allegations during a televised interview claims that have since ignited fierce debate across South Africa.

At the same time, the Department of Correctional Services (DCS) has launched its own investigation not into the claims themselves, but into how the interview was allowed to happen in the first place.

The claims that lit the fuse

Prim, speaking in a telephonic interview aired by eNCA, alleged a past relationship with McKenzie dating back to around 2012.

According to him, their connection resurfaced years later, around the time of the killing of Nathaniel Julies a tragedy that shook the country and sparked widespread outrage over policing.

Prim claims he later assisted McKenzie with a social media push during a by-election campaign in Riverlea, even contributing financially. He alleges that the relationship eventually collapsed over an unpaid debt.

But it didn’t stop there.

He went further, alleging links between McKenzie and illicit networks, claiming to have recordings, emails and financial documents to back up his version of events. He also made claims about receiving contraband phones in prison and suggested his placement in a high-security unit was connected to attempts to silence him.

None of these claims have been independently verified.

Jermaine Prim contacted me from the prison phone number.

Prim tells me on #eNCA that he will die for the truth. #JermainePrim pic.twitter.com/cox4O0b525

Heidi Giokos (@HeidiGiokos) March 28, 2026

Parliament, politics and a letter

The situation escalated after Prim’s name surfaced during a parliamentary ad hoc committee session examining claims linked to KwaZulu-Natal police commissioner Nhlanhla Mkhwanazi.

During proceedings, MK Party MP David Skosana raised questions about a letter allegedly written by Prim. The document reportedly references conversations with murder-accused businessman Vusimuzi “Cat” Matlala.

Mkhwanazi acknowledged the contents but noted the letter amounts to hearsay adding another layer of uncertainty to an already murky situation.

McKenzie’s response: “categorically false”

McKenzie and the Patriotic Alliance have come out swinging.

In a strongly worded response, the party dismissed Prim’s allegations as “reckless and defamatory,” questioning his credibility and pointing to his criminal history.

They argue that no verifiable evidence has been produced and accuse sections of the media of amplifying unproven claims.

McKenzie has now indicated he will pursue legal action against multiple parties including government officials, the broadcaster, and the journalist involved and plans to escalate the matter to the Broadcasting Ombudsman.

DCS under pressure over prison interview

While the political fallout unfolds, the spotlight has also shifted to how the interview happened at all.

The Department of Correctional Services confirmed that the telephonic engagement was conducted without the required approval from the National Commissioner a breach of protocol that has triggered a full-scale internal investigation.

In a system where inmate communication is tightly controlled, the incident raises uncomfortable questions about oversight and enforcement inside correctional facilities.

Public reaction: scepticism, curiosity and fatigue

On social media, South Africans are doing what they do best debating, dissecting and, in some cases, dismissing the drama altogether.

Some users are calling for evidence before drawing conclusions, while others believe the claims should be taken seriously, regardless of the source.

There’s also a sense of fatigue. For many, this feels like yet another high-profile political clash filled with allegations, denials and legal threats, but little resolution.

A familiar pattern in SA politics

If this saga feels familiar, that’s because it is.

South African politics has long been shaped by explosive claims that emerge in fragments a leaked letter here, an interview there, often without immediate proof, but with enough intrigue to dominate headlines.

What makes this case particularly complex is the source: a convicted inmate whose credibility is already under scrutiny, but who is making claims serious enough to demand attention.

For now, there are more questions than answers.

Will Prim produce the evidence he claims to have?
Will McKenzie’s legal action shift the narrative?
And what will the DCS investigation reveal about security lapses inside prisons?

One thing is certain, this story is far from over.

And in true South African fashion, the court of public opinion is already in session.

{Source: IOL}

Follow Joburg ETC on Facebook, Twitter , TikTok and Instagram

For more News in Johannesburg, visit joburgetc.com