‘I won’t apologise’: Kunene digs in as Malema takes defamation fight to court

South African politics is no stranger to public spats, but every now and then, a war of words spills into something far more serious.

That’s exactly where things now stand between Julius Malema and Kenny Kunene, with a R1 million defamation lawsuit threatening to turn a podcast comment into a courtroom showdown.

And if there was any doubt about how this might play out, Kunene has made his stance crystal clear: he’s not backing down.

From podcast talk to legal firestorm

The dispute traces back to a February 2026 episode of the popular Podcast and Chill with MacG, where Kunene made remarks about Malema that the EFF leader now claims crossed the line.

At the centre of the case is Kunene referring to Malema as “a boy” a term Malema argues carries racial weight and historical baggage in the South African context.

But that’s not the only issue.

Malema is also challenging claims made by Kunene about his alleged movements and associations, including references to businessman Adriano Mazzotti and the late taxi figure Jotham “Mswazi” Msibi.

Kunene doubles down

Instead of issuing an apology, Kunene has filed his answering affidavit complete with supporting witness statements and is preparing for a full legal battle.

In his response, he argues that some of the details he mentioned are already part of the public record. He specifically points to Malema’s attendance at Msibi’s funeral as relevant context.

More importantly, Kunene says he has no intention of retracting his statements.

He has gone further, accusing Malema of misusing the courts and framing the lawsuit as part of a pattern.

A clash bigger than words

On the surface, this is a defamation case. But politically, it cuts deeper.

Malema has long positioned himself as a fierce defender of dignity and accountability in public discourse. Kunene, on the other hand, is leaning into a different argument, one centred on freedom of expression and the right to speak openly, even controversially.

That tension is something many South Africans are watching closely.

Social media: divided and loud

As expected, the reaction online has been anything but quiet.

Some users are backing Malema, arguing that language matters especially in a country with South Africa’s history, where certain words carry painful echoes.

Others are siding with Kunene, saying politicians should expect criticism and tough talk, particularly in public forums like podcasts.

And then there’s a third group those simply watching the drama unfold, predicting yet another high-profile court case that could drag on for months.

The cultural weight of words

What makes this case particularly interesting is how it taps into something deeply South African: the power of language.

Words like “boy” are not neutral in this context. They carry a legacy shaped by apartheid and racial hierarchy, which is why the courts may ultimately have to weigh not just what was said, but how it would reasonably be understood.

That’s where this case could set an important precedent.

A familiar courtroom battleground

This isn’t the first time Malema has taken legal action over statements made about him, something Kunene himself pointed out.

For critics, that raises questions about whether defamation law is being used strategically in political battles. For supporters, it’s about holding people accountable for harmful speech.

Either way, the courts will now have the final say.

What happens next

With both sides standing firm, the case is heading toward a legal showdown that could test the boundaries between free speech and defamation in South Africa’s political arena.

For now, one thing is certain: neither man is willing to blink.

And in a country where politics often plays out as much in public opinion as it does in Parliament, this is one courtroom battle that’s likely to keep South Africans watching closely.

{Source: IOL}

Follow Joburg ETC on Facebook, Twitter , TikTok and Instagram

For more News in Johannesburg, visit joburgetc.com