Tobacco Bill Sparks Debate: Protecting Public Health or Fueling Illicit Trade?

South Africa’s long-debated Tobacco Bill is once again in the spotlight and this time, the stakes are high. On one side, health experts insist that stricter smoking laws are needed to safeguard non-smokers, children, and future generations. On the other, industry voices warn that heavy-handed regulation could backfire, pushing smokers into the arms of illicit traders.

Whose rights matter most?

Patricia Lambert, a constitutional lawyer and representative of the Campaign for Tobacco Free Kids, told Parliament’s Portfolio Committee on Health this week that arguments about smokers’ rights miss the bigger picture.

“The right to a healthy environment is non-negotiable,” she said, explaining that South Africa’s Constitution allows for limitations on individual rights when the broader public good is at stake. “No rights are absolute. If smoking indoors harms others, especially young people government has a duty to step in.”

Her comments echo Article 24 of the Constitution, which guarantees South Africans the right to a clean and healthy environment. Lambert argued that ignoring the harms of smoking or vaping would be “an abdication of responsibility.”

The case for zero smoking indoors

The South African Non-Communicable Diseases Alliance (SANCDA) backed Lambert’s stance, highlighting sobering statistics. A national tobacco survey found that nearly one in five adults are exposed to secondhand smoke at home, while 11% encounter it at work.

While current laws allow up to 25% of indoor areas to be designated for smokers, SANCDA’s Elize Joubert argued this compromise is outdated and dangerous. “Partial bans don’t protect workers or the public. A complete ban in indoor spaces and some outdoor ones is the only way to secure everyone’s right to health.”

She added that e-cigarettes are no safer, with long-term health risks still emerging and a worrying spike in teenage use.

Packaging wars: Warnings vs branding

The Bill also pushes for plain packaging and larger, more graphic health warnings on tobacco products. Joubert believes this will help smokers quit and prevent young people from starting. “Only 35% of smokers even consider quitting when looking at current packaging. Bigger warnings save lives,” she said.

But critics argue that stripping away branding could have unintended consequences.

Big Tobacco fights back

British American Tobacco’s Johnny Moloto issued a stark warning last week: by making legal cigarettes less accessible and less attractive, the Bill could drive smokers straight into the illicit market.

“Every new restriction risks boosting illegal trade,” Moloto told Parliament. “Government would lose tax revenue, and consumers would be left exposed to products with no quality checks or age restrictions.”

This warning isn’t without precedent. South Africa has long struggled with illicit cigarette sales, especially during the hard lockdown tobacco ban in 2020, when the black market thrived.

A bigger picture

Beyond the back-and-forth in Parliament, ordinary South Africans are weighing in too. On social media, some applaud the Bill, sharing personal stories of quitting after seeing health warnings or experiencing the harms of secondhand smoke. Others worry about enforcement, pointing out that many existing bans are ignored in bars, taxis, and public spaces.

What’s clear is that the Tobacco Bill is not just about cigarettes, it’s about public health, constitutional rights, and the country’s fight against preventable diseases. But it’s also about jobs, revenue, and the unintended consequences of cracking down too hard.

As the debate continues, South Africa faces a choice: double down on protecting health at all costs, or tread carefully to avoid empowering the black market. Either way, the outcome will shape how future generations live, breathe, and smoke or don’t.

{Source: The Citizen}

Follow Joburg ETC on Facebook, Twitter , TikTok and Instagram

For more News in Johannesburg, visit joburgetc.com