PIE Amendment Bill: What South Africa’s proposed eviction law changes mean

South Africa’s eviction laws could soon look very different if proposed amendments to the Prevention of Illegal Eviction from and Unlawful Occupation of Land (PIE) Act become law.

The draft PIE Amendment Bill, published by Human Settlements Minister Thembi Simelane for public comment, aims to give courts clearer guidelines when deciding whether an eviction is fair, while introducing tougher measures against organised land invasions.

The proposals have already sparked discussion across the property sector, where landlords, legal experts and housing activists continue to debate how South Africa should balance constitutional housing rights with private property ownership. If passed, the amendments could change the way eviction disputes are handled across the country.

South Africa’s existing PIE Act was introduced to ensure that nobody could be removed from a property without a court order, replacing the often harsh eviction practices of the past.

Under the current law, judges must decide whether an eviction is ‘just and equitable’ by weighing factors such as how long someone has occupied a property, whether vulnerable people are involved and whether alternative accommodation is available.

The proposed Bill keeps those protections in place but adds more detail about what courts should consider before making a decision. According to the draft legislation, the aim is to make eviction laws more effective, easier to understand and simpler to enforce.

One of the biggest proposed changes is that courts would have to consider the intention behind an unlawful occupation.
Rather than looking only at the fact that someone occupies land illegally, judges would also examine why it happened and the circumstances surrounding the occupation.

The Bill states that courts should place greater emphasis on ‘the circumstances and intention behind unlawful occupation’, while still considering whether an eviction would be just and equitable. Legal experts say this represents a move towards a more detailed, fact-based approach rather than relying on broad assumptions about vulnerability.

The proposed amendments also target people accused of organising or encouraging unlawful occupations. Anyone found to have arranged, incited or coordinated illegal land occupations could face significantly tougher penalties, even if they did not receive money from the activity.

The Bill also proposes much harsher sanctions for people who illegally sell land they do not own, including fines of up to R2 million and the possibility of asset forfeiture. Meanwhile, the maximum prison sentence linked to organising unlawful occupations would increase from two years to five years.

The draft legislation also introduces several practical changes aimed at reducing lengthy court disputes. Among the proposals are mandatory mediation before certain eviction matters proceed, automatic involvement of municipalities in eviction proceedings and a faster eviction process for landlords who can prove they are suffering serious financial hardship.

Another notable change concerns temporary accommodation. While courts would still be able to order that alternative accommodation be provided where necessary, the Bill proposes that any temporary arrangement should include a clear expiry date instead of continuing indefinitely.

Courts would also be allowed to grant eviction orders without automatically requiring municipalities or the state to provide alternative land or housing in every case.

The Bill also places greater emphasis on evidence, particularly where someone has occupied a property for less than six months. Instead of considering vulnerability in general terms, courts would examine factors such as an occupier’s financial position, health and previous living arrangements before deciding whether an eviction is appropriate.

The intention is to create a more consistent and transparent process, while recognising that every eviction case has unique circumstances.

The draft Bill has now been published for public comment, allowing landlords, tenants, property professionals, municipalities and members of the public to weigh in before Parliament considers the proposed changes. The public comment period closes on 6 August 2026, after which the draft legislation is expected to move to the next stage of the legislative process.

As the Bill itself notes, the proposed changes are intended to provide ‘greater clarity and consistency’ in an area of law that has long required courts to balance constitutional rights with the realities facing both property owners and unlawful occupiers.

Follow Joburg ETC on Facebook, Twitter, TikTok and Instagram

For more News in Johannesburg, visit joburgetc.com

Featured Image: Simon Hurry / Unsplash