News
Fikile Mbalula Secures Court Gag Order Against Brown Mogotsi Over Defamatory Claims
Fikile Mbalula Secures Court Gag Order Against Brown Mogotsi
In a decisive legal victory, ANC Secretary-General Fikile Mbalula has successfully obtained a gagging order against controversial businessman Brown Mogotsi at the Gauteng High Court in Pretoria. The order comes after Mogotsi made highly inflammatory statements linking Mbalula to the 2022 murder of billionaire businessman Wandile Bozwana and implicating him in a Free State housing scandal.
Judge Jacobus Strydom ruled that Mogotsi’s public comments, spread across television and social media, were false, defamatory, and harmful to Mbalula’s reputation, and ordered their immediate retraction.
Court Orders Retraction and Restraint
The ruling is clear: Mogotsi must remove all defamatory statements within 48 hours and is prohibited from making further comments or interviews implying that Mbalula had any involvement in Bozwana’s murder or benefited from the housing scandal.
Judge Strydom highlighted that Mogotsi did not provide evidence to substantiate his claims, nor did he demonstrate that the statements were fair commentary. “These allegations are extremely harmful to Mbalula’s reputation,” the judge noted, describing the statements as unlawful.
The court also referred the issue of damages to oral evidence, which will determine the compensation Mbalula is entitled to receive.
Background: The Bozwana Murder Case
The case has resonated in South Africa since the death of billionaire Wandile Bozwana, who was fatally shot in 2022. His alleged killers, including Vusi “Khekhe” Mathibela, were sentenced last year to 30 years’ imprisonment each.
Mogotsi had claimed that Mbalula was seen with Mathibela days before Bozwana’s murder and suggested he was associated with those responsible for the killing. The judge found these statements to be utterly baseless.
Public Reaction and Social Media Buzz
News of the gag order has sparked discussion online, with many South Africans expressing relief that the court is clamping down on false and damaging narratives.
“It’s about time someone held these social media bullies accountable. Lies can destroy reputations,” tweeted one user.
“No one should be able to drag public figures through mud without proof. The court did the right thing,” another commented.
The case also highlights the ongoing challenge public figures face in navigating a social media landscape rife with unverified allegations and conspiracies.
A Legal Precedent for Defamation
Legal experts note that this ruling serves as a strong precedent for South African courts, emphasizing that unfounded claims linking public figures to crimes or corruption will not be tolerated.
“The court is sending a clear message that social media statements, even when sensational, can have real legal consequences,” said Advocate Thando Molefe, commenting on the decision.
Mbalula’s victory could also influence how other public figures respond to defamatory statements, reinforcing accountability and the protection of reputations.
Brown Mogotsi is now legally bound to comply with the gag order and may face additional legal action and damages if he continues spreading false claims. Meanwhile, Fikile Mbalula has reinforced his commitment to protecting his reputation and holding defamers accountable, a stance that resonates with many South Africans frustrated by persistent online misinformation.
{Source: IOL}
Follow Joburg ETC on Facebook, Twitter , TikTok and Instagram
For more News in Johannesburg, visit joburgetc.com
