South Africa’s Food Poisoning Crisis: Why Government Measures Miss the Mark

South Africa is grappling with a devastating food poisoning crisis that has claimed the lives of more than 20 children and left hundreds hospitalized. In response, the government declared a national disaster in late 2024, launching measures aimed at curbing the outbreak.

But according to experts from the Gauteng City-Region Observatory (GCRO), these measures focus on symptoms rather than root causes, raising concerns about the effectiveness of the response.

What Caused the Outbreak?

Investigations by the National Institute for Communicable Diseases (NICD) revealed that the outbreak was linked to hazardous pesticides—specifically Terbufos and Aldicarb. Originally intended for agricultural use, these toxic chemicals have found their way into the informal market as unregulated “street pesticides” for rat control. This contamination has infiltrated food supplies, with tragic consequences.

Government’s Immediate Response:

The government has implemented three key interventions:

1. Mandatory Registration of Spaza Shops: All food handling outlets, including informal retailers, must register with municipalities by February 2025.
2. Widespread Food Outlet Inspections: A large-scale campaign is underway to inspect spaza shops and informal traders for compliance with health regulations.
3. R500 Million Support Fund: A fund to support township and rural businesses aims to improve infrastructure and business capacity.

While these actions are necessary, they don’t address the structural issues that contributed to the crisis in the first place.

Why These Measures Fall Short

1. Overburdened Municipal Systems

The outbreak highlights the failure of municipalities to enforce food safety regulations effectively. Regular inspections could have identified food contamination risks before they turned deadly. However, limited municipal capacity makes it difficult to conduct thorough, ongoing checks.

2. Formalisation Challenges for Informal Businesses

The push to formalise spaza shops could disrupt livelihoods in low-income communities. Many informal businesses lack the necessary paperwork to meet registration requirements, such as zoning certificates, tax clearance, and business registration. Forcing compliance without support risks shutting down vital food sources in vulnerable areas.

3. Exclusionary Support Criteria

While the R500 million fund sounds promising, its strict eligibility criteria exclude many informal businesses. Most township entrepreneurs operate outside formal structures, meaning they don’t qualify for the very support meant to help them.

The Real Issue: Infrastructure and Public Services

According to the GCRO’s Quality of Life Survey (2023/24):

• Access to refuse removal in Gauteng dropped from 83% (2020/21) to 74% (2023/24).
• Satisfaction with public services fell from 75% to 64% over the same period.
• Household hunger and food insecurity have increased significantly over the past decade.

These statistics point to a broader public health crisis driven by:

• Poor waste management leading to rat infestations
• Inadequate water and sanitation infrastructure
• Irregular service delivery in low-income communities

Without addressing these systemic failures, food safety interventions will be temporary fixes.

What Needs to Change?

The government’s focus on formalising businesses and enforcing compliance is important but insufficient. To prevent future crises, South Africa must:

• Improve waste management systems to reduce environmental health risks
• Invest in basic infrastructure like clean water and sanitation in vulnerable areas
• Support informal businesses with flexible registration processes and capacity-building programs
• Strengthen municipal oversight with better funding and training for health inspectors

South Africa’s food poisoning crisis is a wake-up call. While new regulations may help in the short term, the real solution lies in tackling the root causes: failing infrastructure, weak public services, and exclusionary economic policies. Without meaningful change, vulnerable communities will continue to face preventable health risks.

Follow Joburg ETC on Facebook, Twitter , TikTok and Instagram

For more News in Johannesburg, visit joburgetc.com