Connect with us

News

Charges against National Police Commissioner Fannie Masemola set to be formally withdrawn

Charges against National Police Commissioner Fannie Masemola over the SAPS-Medicare24 tender are expected to be formally withdrawn by the NPA due to insufficient evidence.

Published

on

Charges against National Police Commissioner Fannie Masemola in connection with a controversial SAPS health services tender are expected to be formally withdrawn by the National Prosecuting Authority (NPA). Masemola was due to appear in the Pretoria Magistrates Court on 22 September 2026 as the withdrawal was anticipated to be processed.

What the charges were

Masemola faced four charges alleging violations of the Public Finance Management Act (PFMA) related to a tender awarded to Vusimuzi “Cat” Matlala’s company, Medicare 24 Tshwane District. The broader procurement associated with the dispute was valued at about R360 million, while the specific contract central to the court proceedings has been described as a R228 million deal.

Why the NPA plans to withdraw

The NPA said it would withdraw a PFMA charge against Masemola on the basis that there is insufficient evidence to secure a conviction. Investigators had found the procurement process to be irregular, and at least R50 million was paid under the contract before SAPS cancelled it in May 2025.

Professional and legal fallout

Masemola was suspended after being accused of failing to provide oversight in the multi-million-rand contract. The prospect of the NPA’s withdrawal has led to reports that a return to work and a meeting with President Cyril Ramaphosa are being considered.

Representations and commission evidence

Masemola’s legal representative told the Pretoria Magistrates Court that formal representations were submitted to NPA head Advocate Andy Mothibi, requesting review and withdrawal of the charges.

During proceedings at the Madlanga commission, evidence was presented suggesting Masemola was allegedly targeted by the Investigative Directorate Against Corruption (Idac). Former Idac head Andrea Johnson disputed that allegation, but she conceded that Masemola should have been charged separately. Johnson previously explained that Masemola was charged under section 38 of the PFMA in his capacity as the accounting officer of SAPS.

Allegations against Masemola

The PFMA-related allegations include that Masemola failed to prevent irregular and fruitless expenditure and failed to stop payments under the contract despite allegedly being alerted to irregularities.

The expected formal withdrawal by the NPA marks a significant development in a high-profile investigation into SAPS procurement and oversight. Further court proceedings were scheduled for 22 September 2026.

Follow Joburg ETC on Facebook, TwitterTikTok and Instagram

For more News in Johannesburg, visit joburgetc.com

Source: citizen.co.za